To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (22963 ) 12/3/1998 10:34:00 AM From: PROLIFE Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39621
Emile,First, this is not your conversation Yes, it was. You took a quote directly out of our conversation and started in. It amounts to an ugly sum when added to ungratitude. Ungratitude?? You think I should have gratitude for you? Not hardly buddy. I have agreed with some of what you have said in the past, by pm to Mark and others, but not the way you said it.All of that pales into nothingness compared to your desire to suddenly judge me when you never raised a word against Mark and others for lying and twisting my words in the harshess of manners to make me appear as a KKKers or Naz Everything pales into nothingness when it concerns you? And there is no suddenly about it. I have disagreed with Marks message from the time I have beenhere. Just not to your level of hateful attitude. He knows exactly where I stand. And as far as you and the Markoffs, I THINK I have stayed out of that completely, as if I need to answer to you. And I will tell you another thing. If someone accused me of being KK or nazi, you know what I would do? I would have a short clear post telling them they are wrong and deny it.I didn't even go when they posted the URL to me so I really do not know what kind of a site they are talking about. Of course, you see nothing wrong with their behaviour. What kind of a biased and cowardly Christian are you. Here again, you should at least go to the URL so you could have the chance to deny it if so desired. And yes I see something wrong in anyone calling someone a nazi JUST THE SAME as I see it wrong for someone to put a label of TALMUDIC JEW on someone!! You are selective and cowardly to dare raise this voice now. You have obviously harbered some kind of hatred that is finally coming to the surface now. haha...so far I am selective, cowardly, biased and cowardly(again),a hater,...oh well let's go on. My post was short. I wanted you to leave yourself out of my conversation with Mark. EVERYTHING is the blame of the talmud in your eyes, and my conversation was not about the talmud with him.Your coversation??? Who has a appointed you as a judge ? Who has recognized your authority. I think you need to back off and reexamine your spirit. Better yet, let it all out and let your try nature and spirit come to the surface. What does a judge have to do with it? And yes it was my conversation, although I will admit to getting tired of your talmudic this and talmudic that. I assume now you will acuse me of being a follower of the talmud. Accuse away.I've avoided your conversations becasue I've known something about you for a very long time. You know what it is so please le You ever watch the old tv show Mash. You ever hear of Col. Flagg? Unveil your threats man. ps: define martyr ps: define saint dan