Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (2343)	12/3/1998 12:49:00 AM
From: Kirk ©	Respond to of 15132

Oops.... It was actually IBM not AMAT, but I guess it just shows that you can take a name of a good company doing well and a bug shows up to tell you why it shouldn't have seen its stock price go up! regards

To: Kirk © who wrote (2343)	12/3/1998 11:33:00 PM
From: Lars	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15132

Kirk, >>> Thanks. Read your bud the bug on another thread commenting on why AMAT shouldn't have gone up since its earnings are poor! Seems the Davis record is scratched and stuck playing the same bit over and over.... Jeepers, CD player kids will never understand this experience! >>> This guy/gal is lost. You can bet that when the sector corrects that he/she will take credit. I would enjoy the humor of seeing this bug's actual portfolio. If he/she is so confident about false runup why don't they short AMAT.