SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ed who wrote (12912)12/3/1998 4:13:00 AM
From: nihil  Respond to of 74651
 
RE: Microsoft trial

Don't get too depressed. The judge is biased, and BG has managed to annoy him into showing it (and he's been reversed once in the consent decree case). This is a civil trial and no one is going to be branded a criminal. I haven't seen anyone bleeding yet, and maybe Barksdale feels picked on, but no one has been hurt so far. Where's the damage to competition? If the namecalling in e-mail in MSFT is illegal, wait until they get a load of the transcripts of the Cowboys in a huddle. At the worst, the judge will order MSFT to cease and desist from talking so nasty. I can't imagine the judge requiring MSFT to charge for IE. To order distribution of source code for Windows would be ridiculous. Its bad enough to have one version. Suppose everyone could "fix" it. Hardly seems reasonable after Sun's victory over the Java license. As to the supposed monopoly price of Windows, the competitive price is $0 (the LRMC curve decreases at every quantity), but that is true of every piece of software. I think when MSFT introduces its per piece OS and application software prices IBM and Solaris will be shown to be greedy profiteers.
Then there are the appeals. So relax. This will take a while and will hardly hurt at all.



To: ed who wrote (12912)12/3/1998 6:56:00 AM
From: Cory Gault  Respond to of 74651
 
Ed:

This is a good point....The longest lasting effect of this case is that every company with more than 3 employees will institute a mandatory email purge policy....

CG



To: ed who wrote (12912)12/3/1998 10:01:00 AM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Nobody has been assumed to be a criminal in this case.

Why would internal correspondence NOT be evidence?

And freedom of speech is not at risk.

Where do you get these ideas? Do you see demons in the night?

JMHO.