SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Sammons who wrote (42669)12/3/1998 10:46:00 AM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572777
 
Re: "It is unlikely K6-400 will beat PII-400. The site w/ the lower P2-450 Win98 score most likely used slower peripherals than Anand. "

Anand's test system was the same for both 400 MHz chips, with the exception of CPU, motherboard, and chipset. K6 shows a higher score than PII at 400 MHz on Anand's site. Anand doesn't post 450 MHz scores.

Kevin



To: Ed Sammons who wrote (42669)12/3/1998 11:25:00 AM
From: Brian Hutcheson  Respond to of 1572777
 
Ed , read my post first
I was using Anand's figures to extrapolate a likely score for PII-450
Using the relationship between Win 98 score and clock speed cited by Anand .
Using these figures , I estimate that a PII-450 will score 27.4
on Win 98 vs the 26.8 cited for K6-2 400 ,
Brian


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News