To: Blue On Black who wrote (70 ) 12/3/1998 3:19:00 PM From: Rob S. Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 384
Lee, I admit that I have been goading this thread with my posts, but I didn't intend that post directly at you. I'm trying to encourage some real detective work and use of our brains to figure out what this company's potential is or is not. This is a very small company that faces many hurdles but I believe them so far when they tell me that they are tying first and foremost to do the technical and field trials work. They have not been out there doing the investment community tour gambit nor have they hired a company to promote the stock. In essence, we little guys have the opportunity once in a while to discover a company with significant potential before it gains widespread awareness. To separate fact from fiction takes some work beyond surfing the net. Dig in and get the facts from independent sources and blast me with them - if there is something wrong with this situation I'd like to be among the first to know. If this company is in the position I belive them to be in, then it won't be long before some major announcements bring them into visibility and the stock takes off. If I am wrong, then instead of postings about NASBB v. NASD:BB I love to see a counter to the proposition that this company has a viable product targeted at huge markets. This isn't likely to become a large company but has a great chance to become a nice and profitable one that rewards investors at this early stage, IMO. No, it's not full NASDAQ listed, I never posted that it ws and have posted repeatedly that it is BB listed. If people visiting this thread don't like to invest in BB issues, then don't invest in GDER. If you find the company interesting, then take the time to pry into it further - it's the early bird who gets the worm and the also rans who pick up the scraps.