Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ptaskmaster who wrote (34440)	12/3/1998 7:24:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Respond to of 35569

Ptask, Are you that old that it is a real task to P? Yes, that is right, darkness is best kept swept over the shareholders eyes. Let them see the light and they are gone, like bagged cats. Bill

To: Ptaskmaster who wrote (34440)	12/3/1998 9:16:00 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Ptaskmaster, since you do not know what is happening, and all of your guessing and speculation and might/maby/could are negative comments, then to me, I have a case to present to SI that your purpose to post on this thread is for destructive purposes only. Either you have a monetary interest, as a shorter or helper to a shorter, or you simply wish to pour salt in open wounds, or even as little as to create worry and fear and helplessness. So add to the running total, and I will do my best to have your SI rights removed. My e-mail to SI will expand on the following that you have just posted. <<In addition if there are secret locations or methods in the reports....>> <<Or embarrassing criticisms of IPM's procedures by their consulting professional geologists? >> Also, I am able to view your posts on other threads to support my view that your posts are to un-help. For example: To: **** From: Ptaskmaster , some of us greatly appreciate informed questions, why don't you ask yours of ** ? They would be of interest to many, perhaps even more so if left unanswered ? Also, I will highlight those that engage you and support and help the negative cause you present. For example, as follows on this thread today. From: Bill Jackson Tim, The shareholders at large were not consulted their own reasons, which I feel were base ones. There are few valid reasons to keep such reports secret and such secrecy is a basis for suspicion. Just another suspicious act. Yes, that is right, darkness is best kept swept over the shareholders eyes. Let them see the light and they are gone, like bagged cats. Doug