Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ptaskmaster who wrote (34443)	12/3/1998 10:11:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

This is getting good, the Earp Brothers Stake Claims again.( BTW Dale and I have 4 claims near them- they had their claim displayedat the BLM last year) Doc Halladay uses snake oil to grese the thread. And IPM, uses free electricity to drill the cores, sample the rocks and SX/EW the goodies. If only they did! If only they did. They did NOT guys. They are belly up guys and the only thought, here and now is will Dale Runyon suceed where others failed. MY MONEY, efforts andthose of others are with that effort. Bill Jackson and PTguy say stuff, Doug always says thinking stuff that I have to read between the lines. Mark it with a steel benchmark and come back to the center from the far side. Nuff of writing Jill, she is the concept for the rule of law. The law is bent, so what, in the giant sceem of things, so what. Chuca PS- Doug, you know I am not a short ...these were picked up from a post I made last week or so on Rambus Thread from them reading me there...maybe it was on the Desert Dirt New Clothes Thread of Tims...I didn't like Intel having a BD secret Pack like BD had ...with Rambus ! RE:<<..To: +Ptaskmaster (34444 ) From: +Doug A K Thursday, Dec 3 1998 9:15PM ET Reply # of 34448 Ptaskmaster, since you do not know what is happening, and all of your guessing and speculation and might/maby/could are negative comments, then to me, I have a case to present to SI that your purpose to post on this thread is for destructive purposes only. Either you have a monetary interest, as a shorter or helper to a shorter, or you simply wish to pour salt in open wounds, or even as little as to create worry and fear and helplessness. So add to the running total, and I will do my best to have your SI rights removed. My e-mail to SI will expand on the following that you have just posted. <<In addition if there are secret locations or methods in the reports....>> <<Or embarrassing criticisms of IPM's procedures by their consulting professional geologists? >> Also, I am able to view your posts on other threads to support my view that your posts are to un-help. For example: To: **** From: Ptaskmaster , some of us greatly appreciate informed questions, why don't you ask yours of ** ? They would be of interest to many, perhaps even more so if left unanswered ? Also, I will highlight those that engage you and support and help the negative cause you present. For example, as follows on this thread today. From: Bill Jackson Tim, The shareholders at large were not consulted their own reasons, which I feel were base ones. There are few valid reasons to keep such reports secret and such secrecy is a basis for suspicion. Just another suspicious act...>> It is true that IPM made BD sign a statement like Intel signed on Rambus last month...no talkie anything bad...that; SIR, stinks. And it was Mr J. E. Currie that I argued FOR that anti SECRECY IPM /BD vote for at the AGM 1997 IPM, I have since change my stand and think it is stonwalling. Intel is agreeing to it with Rambus...so what if the Rambus has some onion peeling...will the Investors ever know...Rambus could be big, could be a big fall situation also. If...big if. I tripped once. BD should not of agreed to such a contract, Intel should not of last month...see where I am thinking on this? Goodnite. I will read Dougs' 3 AM response tomorrow, afternoon, med stuff in AM with a relative. Wish us luck.