Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RJC2006 who wrote (17170)	12/4/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Those who say there is a difference between "not guilty" and "innocent" are actually saying we're p'oed over the decision and we're not giving in!>> Those who say that about those who say there is a difference between "not guilty" and "innocent" are uninformed about how the justice system works. People "get off" all the time merely because the prosecution could not produce the right evidence. That doesn't make them innocent. It only means there was not enough evidence in court to prove guilt. We can not even "prove" they are not guilty. We can only establish enough convincing proof of guilt to convict them, or not.