Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (17199)	12/4/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Respond to of 67261

Thanks for the offer, brees, but you can keep him. Cheers, Dan.

To: one_less who wrote (17199)	12/4/1998 2:23:00 PM
From: RJC2006	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<<Actually, Bob needs to cross over to your side on this one. Since Bill Clinton has not been "proven guilty" in a court, Bob would claim his innocence is proven. Yep, that's him, Bill Clinton the lamb of the 20th century.>>> Wrong...nothing has been "proven" but yes in effect until he is "convicted" in the Senate he is innocent. I don't have a problem with that. On the other hand if and when it goes to the Senate and if he is proven guilty all the moaning in the world by enlightened liberals isn't going to change the fact of his guilt. Ever wonder why Maxine the Mouth Watters is stuttering and stammering after hinting that Ken Starr committed perjury? Ever wonder why Barney the Ballpark Frank is foaming at the mouth crying about impartiality? Get a grip.