SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (17242)12/4/1998 4:34:00 PM
From: Borzou Daragahi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
You're forgiven. :-)

But I'm afraid Hyde has trashed himself way more and better than I or anyone else could ever dream of doing.

WASHINGTON--He mocked the sanctimony of all who "sermonized about how terrible lying is."

Granted, lies were told, he said, but it hardly makes sense to "label every untruth and every deception an outrage."

He also condemned the "disconcerting and distasteful whiff of moralism and institutional self-righteousness" that led Congress to conduct hearings on the deceptions coming from the White House and he denounced the result as "a witch hunt."

So said the House Republican who led the defense of the Reagan administration during the Iran-Contra hearings, the same Rep. Henry J. Hyde of Illinois who is leading the impeachment inquiry against President Clinton....

"It just seems to me too simplistic [to condemn all lying]," he said in 1987. "In the murkier grayness of the real world, choices must often be made."

...

"I want to supply a little context--a word I have come to love--to this situation," Hyde began. He then read from a history that recounted White House lies and concluded that it had long been "a palace of pragmatism where dishonesty flourished."

And when North came before the committee, Hyde quoted an 1810 letter from Thomas Jefferson that said "a strict adherence to the written law is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen but it is not the highest."


latimes.com

What a hypocrite!

It's in the 60s in Chicago. Tomorrow's supposed to get as high as 68. Break out the spring clothes! Unbelievable! Same thing in the Twin Cities?