Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (17258)	12/4/1998 4:44:00 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 67261

You've got a point. I think? Anyway, the rest of the world can do what ever it wants. I've tried to point out that there is a difference in how the legal system veiws the term "not guilty," and what common sense would indicate outside the legal system. By your heart and God's judgement, if you are not guilty, that means exactly the same as innocence. To me innocence involves lack of guilt not lack of ability to prove guilt; as in the legal system. If that's offensive to you and bob, I am sorry. I don't need to harp on it any more.

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (17258)	12/4/1998 4:55:00 PM
From: RJC2006	Respond to of 67261

<<<< OK. To sum it up, courts give two kind of verdicts : "Guilty" and "Not Guilty". And in the latter case, in case you didn't like the verdict, you have the right to keep on harping that "not guilty" is not the same as "innocent" while the rest of the world moves on... :-)>>> Yeah...and the defendent walks free. In his world it would be "you've been found not guilty but since you're not guilty but still not innocent either you gotta come back and visit the court every so often and tell us what you're up to!" LOL! I'll say one thing...I have to have some warped admiration for anyone that could find an issue you an d I agree on! LOLX2!!