Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xilinx (XLNX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neil Mintz who wrote (2102)	12/4/1998 7:21:00 PM
From: uu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3291

Neil: <somewhat off topic> > I will short the stock. Based on projected earnings I see more downside potential than upside movement. Just for the fun I thought to walk in the memory lane of not too long ago (in fact just about a month ago), and see what the shorts were saying! And all following posts are from when the stock was at $39/shr. I really am not the type who enjoys this but I feel the arrogance and abuse some of these shorts were giving longs on this thread justifies this memory lane walk! Message 6114430 Reality is, XlNX has had nothing to show for a PE of 30 or more for a year and a half.Hmmm maybe thats why the Bulls are disappearing from this thread.Wishful thinking ? XLNX bulls have being wishing for a year now,yet XLNX fundamentals keep deteriorating. BTW,once Mike Burke is negative on a company the way he is this one,the grave is already been dug, all you have to do is lower it in the ground.MB is not some yahoo analyst you see on CNBS Bubblevision or Joe Blow short thread.He his the real McCoy. Message 6119527 my avg. is 39+. Iam in until it hits low teens or single digits.* Short term? Would be nice. But I think it'll take at least 2 weeks to get there. MP* And let us not forget the absolute self claimed god of investment Mike Burke's arrogant post: Message 6093939 Message 6094571 yea right.D E N I A L.....Mike Burke is the most knowlegable poster on SI..He know s what he's talking about.He sees XLNX in the 20's... Regards, Addi Jamshidi

To: Neil Mintz who wrote (2102)	12/4/1998 8:23:00 PM
From: Lucinos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3291

Neil, Now a day, after I saw Yahoo went over 200 (should be 400 if w/o a split), I don't believe in any fundamental data anymore. If the fund managers think the stock has future, the stock will run up (not just go up) no matter how high it is. If the fund is doing some small dumping and rotation then a good company like CSCO can go down 50% in a few days (it just happened a few weeks ago). For me, I am now only believing in the HOPE, since it is much more valuable than anything else. Actually, it may be easier for us to trade stock in this way. Just need to follow the crowd, and don't ever try to ask for the reason. To spend the efforts to study the company report is totally wasting of your time. As for XLNX, in my opinion, the top has not yet been confirmed with today's movement. It still has more room to go up until you see some significant dumping (by fund managers. of course). To me, it is too early to guess where is the peak of XLNX in this unbelievable bull run. PL