SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (17324)12/4/1998 7:19:00 PM
From: RJC2006  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<<My comment regarding RU-486 is, here we have a situation where it
is clear a child would be unwanted and precautions could be taken
immediately to stop any unwanted pregnancy immediately.>>>

OK, you just admitted yourself....the child is clearly unwanted so where is the trauma in giving up something unwanted to someone who wants it. You called that cruel. I tend to think of that as being compassionate compared to the "abortion is the only acceptable solution" mantra I hear from the hardened "pro-choice" crowd.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (17324)12/4/1998 7:24:00 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I see you are disappointed that things worked out well for the baby. Social workers? How about her mother?

I'm sorry you are so much against adoption. I have a cousin who was adopted by a VP in a Fortune 500 company. He seems to be happier alive rather than dead.

My wife and I wanted to have a child but she had a medical problem. We looked at adoption but there were few white babies in the system and as I was unemployed we were way down on the list even though I make an average of 70 large a year and have everything paid for. A baby of color? What a joke? That's stealing their heritage. You are right, better to kill the baby rather than have it grow up in the country, playing with dogs, cats , horses and other children and inheriting a love of life.