SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Les H who wrote (460)12/5/1998 7:18:00 AM
From: donald sew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Les,

Thanks for your post. Since I think that was such an important article about the double top, I wanted to paste the whole article here. It is important to note that this article is from one who is BULLISH on the market, but is taking caution and gives an objective view from a technical standpoint.

Personally, I give more credibility to a BULL becoming a little bearish/expressing caution, or on the other hand, a BEAR becoming bullish, than to continually hear bearish comments from a BEAR or bullish comments from a BULL. It just simply shows more objectivity, whether right or wrong.

Les, thanks for bringing this article to our attention

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
12/05/98 Decision Point Alert
DJIA: 9016.14
S&P 500: 1176.46

(This is an excerpt for Top Advisor's Corner)

**********************
CYCLE CONTEXT

People are still concerned that we may still be in a bear market, and there is
certainly plenty of bearish evidence to go around -- a stalling Advance-
Decline Line, extreme bullish sentiment (which is bearish), and now we have to
face a double top on some major market indexes.

The double top is a bearish formation and the fact that the most recent market
top on the Dow and the S&P 500 was about equal to the July top is cause for
concern on a strictly technical basis. If standard double top expectations
were to result from the current configuration, we would see the market decline
once more to the October lows, but this time the retest would fail. At that
point the minimum downside expectation would be a decline to about 5500 on the
Dow.

The problem is that every time the market challenges a previous high, a double
top is formed unless the market simply blasts through the resistance without
hesitation, and in the case of a consolidation move a triple top is also
possible. Considering that most bearish formations do not execute to the
downside as expected, how can we tell which ones are dangerous and which are
not? It is my observation that the likelihood of a given outcome depends
almost entirely on context within market cycles, the most important of which
is the 9-Month Cycle.

I periodically do a market forecast chart and post it to the Chart Spotlite
area of the web site. On each of these charts I highlight the 9-Month Cycle,
and you can clearly see that it has been a reliable market forecasting tool
since 1994. In fact, all the 9-Month Cycles since 1994 have been bull cycles,
meaning that they top late in the cycle, perhaps in month six, seven, or
eight. In a bear market, the reverse occurs and the cycle can possibly top in
month two, three, or four.

The last 9-Month Cycle bottomed on October 8, and now eight weeks later we
have retraced the entire decline on the S&P 500 and have hit new, all-time
highs -- quite an unusual situation. It is also a situation that has us double
topping only two months into the current 9-Month Cycle, and we have to wonder
if maybe the bears are right this time.

I continue to operate under the assumption that we have just begun a new bull
market and that this current 9-Month Cycle will be another bull cycle that
will top out about the first week in April 1999. My assumption is reinforced
by my belief that the Four, Eight and Twelve year cycles also bottomed in
October, and by the reliability of the Presidential Cycle, which can normally
be expected to rise into the last two years of a presidential term.

My overall bullishness does not keep me from standing aside occasionally, such
as now, when I think that a shorter term cycle may give us more trouble than
usual, but we'll take it one step at a time, rather than throwing in the towel
on a secular bull market that still seems to have all its power intact.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<



To: Les H who wrote (460)12/5/1998 11:11:00 AM
From: dennis michael patterson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Les, this is interesting. I assume you were directing me to Carl Slewin's post. My cycles guy says that we have a mid-month dip in December but that there is an excellent chance for an explositve upside rally in early January. I see the downside limited for the NT but I am looking for new lows in 1999.