Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : QGLY - Funny Name Great Product. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: drakes353 who wrote (8639)	12/5/1998 2:32:00 PM
From: david molnar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8960

Drakes....The scan data indicates that CE is selling. Do you wish to call the people at information resources liars?....DRAKES I have no problem with you being short QGLY but i feel you are being paid by others sources to hurt QGLY in your posts. Qgly does not fit the mold of the companies you short.....IE A ton of cash and real sales.....DAVE

To: drakes353 who wrote (8639)	12/7/1998 5:23:00 PM
From: Mike Keys	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 8960

Drakes Now, which Drakes are you? Are you Drakes #1, or #21, or #30? I wish I know whom I am dealing with you smart 30 collaborators. Thank you very much for educating me that short selling is not illegal. What is illegal is trying to manipulate the stock price by spreading misinformation, just like the one you mentioned about in your latest post regarding the UVM Gwaltney's statement. I don't know who this guy, Gwaltney, is. But this ignorant guy is putting all homeopathic products as "unscientific and illogical." Very intelligent medical school professor(?)! At least Richard Miller gave better analysis of the ABC article. You are trying to knock down the CE but Richard Miller acknowledges that Quigley has the "good product" with a bad management. I agree with him and I am hoping Q's management gets their acts together someday. BTW, do not try to patronize me. Do you really think I regard you guys as "smart?" I don't think so. The name, "collaborators" has a bad after tastes, doesn't it? You are one of those collaborators with a devious agenda. I remember one of your posts which you said we are stuck with you (guys) for a long time for Quigley being your short target. Sooner or later, someone in this thread will request an investigation of your questionable activities in this thread. Michael K.