SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gordon Quickstad who wrote (5773)12/5/1998 2:19:00 PM
From: FMK  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
Hi Gordon, I agree with your posts.

Does FRB have the answers?
I remember the information on the Army's new rifle came from a broker who was discussing the new product with Alliant Tech. I was told that when the subject of who supplies the battery came up, the Alliant spokesperson had to check and called the broker back with the statement that Valence is supplying the batteries.

I am mentioning this as an example of information that an IR firm that prints and distributes press releases would likely not have the slightest idea about. I doubt it was Lev's intent that any information about Valence's role as component supplier for the new rifle become known prior to release by the U.S. Government or Alliant.

For some examples of what might be in the works, here is an overview I posted recently.

exchange2000.com

These were related to the weapon.
exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com



To: Gordon Quickstad who wrote (5773)12/5/1998 2:59:00 PM
From: Pallisard  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
I tend to agree with Gordon. Huskers broad interpretations with a negative bias of "canned information" can't be very realistic about the present ongoing circumstances of Valence. His assumption that batteries were not and have not been in OEM hands was key to his negative projections.