Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : GREAT STOCKS UNDER $15 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AV8R who wrote (31)	12/5/1998 5:21:00 PM
From: Street Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 126

KERA vs laser Laser is very expensive and is irreversable. With age, your eyes change and so you have to keep having Laser touch up surgery. And what if a new technology comes available in the next few years? Your eyes have been cooked irreversably. KERA is inexpensive and it is totally reversable! As vision changes with age, they just insert new rings. And if a better treatment comes available in many years, this is reversable for you to enjoy the new technology. "KeraVision, founded in 1986, is pioneering the use of corneal polymer inserts with the potential to permanently treat common vision problems without permanently altering the eye." Cowen expects KeraVision's sales to reach $545,000 this year. That figure could grow to $52 million in 2000. That growth looks pretty good to me <g>. Convinced enough? The downside would be if they do not get approved. I have researched the technology and reviewed the study results and am impressed. I believe they will get approved. It is less dangerous and is reversable. It is Safe and Effective.. that is what the FDA is lookin' for. Regards, S.W.