Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (17459)	12/5/1998 9:33:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

This sounds like the much dreaded "liberal ad hominem" to me, Michael. In case you haven't notice, there's plenty of name calling goes on around here, and it'd be hard to claim it's restricted to the "filthy liberals". I've referred to Rush plenty, of course, but never to his appearance, only the now popular style of one-sided derision as political commentary.

To: greenspirit who wrote (17459)	12/5/1998 9:47:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Rofl! Ha Ha Ha Ha Rofl! calling people fat like a bunch of 5th grade playground kids is about all they are capable of offering people. As opposed to the "Hillary is a D O G" and misc remarks about Chelsea (really low btw to insult a kid) that we hear day in and day out from the conservatives here. I guess the dog remarks count as, whats the term, "substantive debate", huh? At least when I make some remark about Rush its some comedic reference and Im trying to be funny or something! Man oh Man does your side need to look in the mirror! sheesh. Oh and btw, if you check out my recent dialogues with Bob Churchill, you will see it is he, a conservative that is preaching the fear of poverty among the elderly. I am in favor of redefining entitlements since I think the beneficiaries are wealthier than the contributors to the program at this point.