Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (1504)	12/6/1998 2:15:00 PM
From: xcr600	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27722

<< myself defend what Paulsen did---after 15 years of working at Navarre,and 31 years in the business--as he says it is fair play to for him to take some money off the table--and I agree>> So do I. Technically, this stock was going to tank regardless of the insider sale. The buble burst on the i-net stocks last Mon AM with the huge gap up opening. << -as one can neither sell or buy stock within 30days of an announcement(that is my understanding >> Not sure on announcements, but I know that insiders can't sell within 30days of earnings releases.

To: LTK007 who wrote (1504)	12/6/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: gammaray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27722

Max, Agree haines is a shark and very good at what he does. It appears that Paulson did sell some shares. Can there be a inut player in the world that by now at least does not suspect that this may have happened? I would think not. Let's give Paulson a little credit. I am hopeful that he understands that squawk box is a tough play. I think that if stock holds up Mon then the squawk appearance could be a positive. Something else to consider is the fact that cnbc executives are probably aware that they are under scrutiny as internet killers. As a result, Paulson may get a fair interview. Neil