SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : wla(warner lambert) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spreck who wrote (378)12/6/1998 3:53:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Respond to of 942
 
[READ NOW!]'Fast-Track' Drug to Treat Diabetes Tied to 33 Deaths
Sunday, December 6, 1998
LA Times
SUNDAY REPORT

Rezulin: The FDA dismissed warnings on the pill, but it was withdrawn in
Britain. Agency and Warner-Lambert say treatment is safe when prescribed
and used properly.
By DAVID WILLMAN, Times Staff Writer






ADVERTISEMENT

ASHINGTON--The Food and Drug
Administration dismissed explicit warnings
of danger as the agency raced to approve a new
diabetes drug that has been linked to at least 33
deaths due to liver injuries, records and interviews show.
Senior FDA officials reviewed the drug on a "fast track" while
downplaying harmful potential side effects. The drug, a pill called
Rezulin, has become a sales sensation since it was launched in
March of 1997 by the Warner-Lambert Co., a major U.S.
pharmaceutical manufacturer and maker of consumer products such
as Dentyne chewing gum.
The first reported deaths due to liver failure prompted the
withdrawal of Rezulin one year ago in Britain. The FDA and
Warner-Lambert have kept the drug on the U.S. market while
instructing doctors on three separate occasions to take additional
steps to protect patients with adult-onset diabetes.
But previously undisclosed cases acknowledged by FDA
officials Friday show that these precautions have not slowed the
pace of patient deaths. The new total of 33 deaths related to use of
Rezulin in the United States and Japan is up from the 21 fatalities
reported by the FDA as of June.
The FDA's handling of Rezulin is shaping up as a nightmare: One
medical officer who opposed the approval of Rezulin was removed
as the chief reviewer of the drug.
Two other FDA physicians who recommended approving the
drug conceded in interviews that the agency initially overlooked
compelling evidence of Rezulin's danger to the liver.

The FDA decision to approve Rezulin without
at least recommending that patients undergo
precautionary liver testing "was an enormous blunder," said Dr. Curt
D. Furberg, a drug testing specialist and head of public health
sciences at Wake Forest University.
"The agency failed," said Furberg, who is familiar with the FDA's
review and oversight of the drug. "It's amazing that Rezulin is still on
the market."
The FDA and Warner-Lambert say that Rezulin is safe for the 1
million or more reported users of the drug when prescribed and
used properly.
"We believe this drug brings a unique and significant benefit for
patients," said Dr. Randall W. Whitcomb, Warner-Lambert's vice
president for diabetes research. "And while it has a risk, [this] is
true of all medications."
Adult-onset diabetes affects 15 million Americans and is
characterized by high blood-sugar levels that can increase the risk
of heart disease and cause other complications. It is distinct from
juvenile-onset diabetes, whose victims would die without daily
injections of insulin.
The story of Rezulin is a window on the new era of accelerated
approval for newly proposed medications. This shift has come amid
complaints from pharmaceutical companies and patient activists that
the FDA had taken too long to approve medications that could save
lives.
The regulation of prescription drugs involves both science and
art--the weighing of risk versus benefit. Some patients with AIDS
or advanced cancer, for instance, are willing to accept extreme risk
for new, experimental treatments.

The story continues in some 20 more sections, starting with the following link:
latimes.com

latimes.com




To: Spreck who wrote (378)12/6/1998 4:02:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 942
 
Thread, story is too long to be pasted here. It will be archived after today and you'll have to pay to read it. Read it now!

scg, I expect it would affect WLA's price tomorrow, though Rezulin's sales are far behind Lipitor. The other newswires/news media would report the LA times story. I had been expecting this to happen for sometime now. May provide a major buying opportunity but better wait a while to see how the stock reacts. If you're holding the stock long term it's not the time to sell. If you're trading that's another matter.



To: Spreck who wrote (378)12/6/1998 5:50:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Respond to of 942
 
Warner-Lambert Shares May Fall on Report of Deaths Linked to Diabetes Pill

Bloomberg News
December 6, 1998, 4:24 p.m. ET

Warner-Lambert Stock May Fall Because of Rezulin-Linked Deaths

Morris Plains, New Jersey, Dec. 6 (Bloomberg) -- Warner-
Lambert Co.'s shares could fall after U.S. regulators confirmed
that about 33 people have died after taking the company's
diabetes pill, Rezulin, one of two key products that made Warner-
Lambert one of the world's most profitable drugmakers.

The Los Angeles Times reported today the 33 deaths have been
linked to liver injuries in Rezulin patients, up from 21 cited
earlier this year. Since Rezulin's introduction in March 1997,
its label has been strengthened three times. A black box on the
label -- considered the Food and Drug Administration's strongest
warning measure -- highlights the section on Rezulin's risks.

While the FDA confirmed the deaths, the agency believes the
drug's benefits outweigh its risks, an agency spokesman said.

''We still feel that the drug is safe and effective when
used as indicated,'' said spokesman Brad Stone. As with any drug,
the FDA will monitor reports of problems and update the drug's
label when necessary, Stone said.

The report could cause the stock to drop, analysts said. Yet
the drug's link to liver problems is well-known and even with the
so-called ''black-box'' warning, doctors are still prescribing
it, they said. Rezulin's third-quarter sales rose 32 percent to
$181 million.

''I'm not sure they can put more restrictions than what they
have,'' said Hemant Shah, an independent drug industry analyst.
''I don't think the drug will be recalled.''

Warner-Lambert, based in Morris Plains, New Jersey, rose 2
15/16 to 78 7/16 Friday. The company licenses Rezulin from
Japan's Sankyo Co.

No Deaths Since July

The FDA generally obtains information on deaths or other
health problems associated with drugs from companies.

In this case, no deaths or liver transplants have been
reported in patients who started on Rezulin after the third label
change in July, said Steve Mock, a Warner-Lambert spokesman. That
label extended the time doctors need to do monthly monitoring of
Rezulin patients for possible liver damage to eight months from
six months.

Rezulin and another drug introduced last year, cholesterol-
reducing Lipitor turned Warner-Lambert from one of the least
successful U.S. drugmakers into one seen as an industry leader.
Warner-Lambert's third-quarter profit rose 49 percent to $296
million, boosted by sales of Lipitor and Rezulin.

Rezulin could have 1998 sales of $700 million and Lipitor of
more than $2 billion, analysts have estimated.

Just a few years earlier, Warner-Lambert had to shut much of
its drug production to meet FDA mandates. Many analysts then
thought the company might sell its pharmaceutical business and
concentrate on consumer goods, such as its Listerine mouthwash
and Dentyne gum.

Other Setbacks

While Lipitor has gained market share steadily, Rezulin has
had several setbacks. Public Citizen, a watchdog group founded by
Ralph Nader, petitioned the FDA in July to ban Rezulin. The group
cited the drug as an example of the flaws in the FDA's recent
moves to speed drug approvals.

The withdrawal of American Home Products Corp.'s painkiller
Duract in June marked the sixth time in 12 months an FDA-approved
drug was pulled from the market because of safety concerns.

Only 10 drugs were withdrawn between 1980 and 1996, a time
when the FDA moved more slowly on drug approvals. Responding to
criticism from Congress and the industry, the FDA has stepped up
the pace of its reviews in recent years. Rezulin, for example,
was reviewed in six months.

The new warnings for Rezulin weren't Warner-Lambert's only
setback this year. In June, the National Institutes of Health
ended a test of Rezulin for diabetes prevention after a patient
developed liver failure and later died.

Sign of Confidence

Still, some analysts viewed an FDA decision last month on
Rezulin as a sign of the agency's confidence in the drug. Warner-
Lambert then said the FDA approved a 1,000-patient study of
Rezulin in people who don't yet have the disease. Regulators set
higher safety standards for use of drugs in people only at risk
of, and not actually suffering from, a disease.

The real concern for Warner-Lambert may be more competition
from similar drugs with fewer side effects than more regulation
from the FDA, said Jeffrey Chaffkin, an analyst with PaineWebber,
who has a ''buy'' on the stock.

Rezulin is the first of the a class known as glitazones
approved in the U.S. SmithKline Beecham Plc and Eli Lilly & Co.
could have their own versions of glitazone drugs on the U.S.
market by 2000. Like Rezulin, these drugs work to help the body
make better use of limited insulin supplies. These pills are used
to treat the more common form of diabetes, Type 2, where the body
fails to produce enough insulin to properly regulate blood sugar.
About 15 million people in the U.S. have this form of diabetes.

''There's no question that the new glitazones are cleaner
than Rezulin,'' Chaffkin said. ''Still, we haven't seen head-to-
head comparisons. Until we see that kind of data, it's hard to
judge them.''

--Kerry Dooley in Princeton and Kristin Jensen in Washington