Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Trinity Biotech (TRIBY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AgAuUSA who wrote (11187)	12/6/1998 8:26:00 PM
From: dowman	Respond to of 14328

Your wild imagination is only rivaled by the inaccuracy of your theories. I post facts as in HIV2 and you post this continuous comment about insider buying. Talk about hype.

To: AgAuUSA who wrote (11187)	12/6/1998 9:25:00 PM
From: Ron Luhmann	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14328

aw ... greg how can you say a company that makes nearly a million $$'s/QTR in profit has a bright future? obviously as others have said and then denied that its a scam stock.(NOT!) how demented can you get to say the company's value is less because they negotiated a favorable tax status and agreed to hire 100 Irish graduates ... like Reebok is valued less because they use cheap labor compared to U.S. labor costs...(right!)

To: AgAuUSA who wrote (11187)	12/6/1998 11:49:00 PM
From: Scott H. Davis	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14328

<<He is a stock basher that refuses to accept or discuss the positive aspects of our company.>> Face it Greg, Dowman's no more consistantly negative than you and Ron are consistantly positive. Dowman is just as unlikely to fully disclose positive or innaccuracies as you and Ron to do so with negatives. How much conjecture is there on this thread about you or Ron having dubious agendas? How come I have yet to see anyone alleging MM manipulation on any SI thread I have ever participated in when a stock is doing well (or especially irrationally well?). But I've seen a boatload of negative MM price manipulation theories/claims when price gaps widely from expectation. Some treat me seriously, some ridicule or evade conspiciously, some graciously answer questions (ACE, Keiko, Milton, Grobnette & others) but when was the last time anybody factually refuted me? Bottom line is there may be a lot of bias in all camps, but there is more vested interest in the long side on this thread. A little more intellectual honesty would be a refreshing change here. Disclosure - I have no position in TRIBY and no collusion with anyone else. I have a target price of 1.5 which I'm waiting to be filled. Scott