Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nevtah/Tower Oil Intl.- NTAH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russn who wrote (3312)	12/6/1998 8:46:00 PM
From: SnakeInATuxedo	Respond to of 3817

There are two levels of pursuit. One is against the Company, its officers and Board of Directors; the other against those who assisted in portraying the Company in the favourable light that they did. Against that background is the need to protect the assets the Company did/does have - licenses, leases, drilling rights, etc. - from being squandered or otherwise misappropriated, because we as NTAH shareholders are the rightful owners of those assets subject, of course, to prior claims by others senior to us. Surely there is a fertile legal mind out there that would enjoy tilting at this windmill. Cry havoc, and let slip the dogs of war.

To: russn who wrote (3312)	12/7/1998 12:33:00 PM
From: kramc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3817

russn, I'm not opposed to joining in on any action. I want to pursue a couple of other documented attempts to get my questions answered prior to looking into legal action. My only concern over legal is what the potential is of getting any of our money back. Certainly some NTAH stockholders will not disclose how much their into this for from a loss perspective. I need this week to complete what I'm trying to do and then I'll get in touch with you. Obviously there is more strength in numbers so the more investors we have with us the better chance we'll have of somebody paying attention. Thanks kramc