Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (38400)	12/7/1998 6:53:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

mary, did you know 20k to 30k children will die today of starvation? do you know why? not for lack of food. for lack of international cooperation and conflicting self interests. just b/c you and your have food doesn't make the world just. take a moment and count to 30k. one by one. that is a lot of children. name a time when wars haven't been fought. wars are raging now. always have been. always will be.

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (38400)	12/7/1998 2:55:00 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

Mary, you and Skeeter Bug are both right. But then, you see, he isn't really disagreeing with you. But you are straying away from your original message, which I thought was very interesting, although potentially disruptive to the elders of the thread, and that is whether the old way of valuing stocks still is the best, or only way. Caveat: I wish I could leave Internut stocks out of the discussion, I think they are a special case, clearly fueled by mania. You, for example, have an impressive knowledge of Intel, which may be superior to that of people who are trained to analyze Intel, e.g. Tom Kurlak. If I were interested in investing in Intel, and was going to accept anyone's opinion, I would certainly consider yours. Do you, yourself, believe that Intel is fairly valued; if so, why, if not, why not? CobaltBlue