Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (23942)	12/7/1998 3:05:00 PM
From: Zardoz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 116764

"Well all I am saying is that you cannot judge a book by its cover and you cannot judge a gold mine by the ultra conservative reserve figures in an annual report. They do not reflect the longevity of the mine." As a semi analyst, surely you must agree that there are others of equal or better information then yourself. And surely this would be reflected in market recommendations. And surely then, it has been taken care of, and the equity reflects this. And surely the financials are the key! And thus the negative earnings are important? And the growth is negative? OH, and as the price of gold declines, so does there dollar asset base. "Why should Uniphase grow?" Don't know, don't care. This is the GPM thread. To many people post stuff unrelated to gold on this thread. Y2K is a prime example. Very little has to do with GOLD. Y2K problems will be limited to only certain sectors, NOT the whole markets. Not direct to E. Charters: {but included to save bandwidth} I got to get ready, Morgy_Dog is taking me for walkies. Got to go get caught up with Rubin {really wish he would stop floating these rumours.} PS: At least I'm not waiting on "a heart attack/car accident/stroke of the ever-youthful GreenSpandex" like others seem to be. My porfolio doesn't depend on others' dying. Shame on O/49r