Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (17653)	12/7/1998 3:55:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 67261

I don't know what evidence Smaltz introduced in specific and therefore could not comment on what he might have missed. As for the make up of the DC Appeals panel, I don't do a lot of appellate work and none in DC. I'm not sure of the current members of the panel nor their identities. However, seeing that Espy got the boot from the ethically challenged WH, the other defendants pled out and Espy admitted to taking the gifts and good things did follow meetings with Espy, I can't imagine a logical basis for an acquittal. JMHO. JLA PS I'm sure you can tell me what I really thought.