SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DaveMG who wrote (19239)12/7/1998 4:16:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Not Good>


news | opinion | letters | contact us | calendar | submit | staff info


Issued on December 07, 1998
D.C. NOTES
By Jeffrey Silva
The National League of Cities, which just wrapped up its 75th annual
meeting in Kansas City, boasts to members of forcing the withdrawal of
the cellular industry's petition before the FCC seeking to pre-empt local
zoning moratoria; defeating a proposed presidential executive order on
federalism; delaying efforts to permit unilateral federal control over siting
wireless facilities on federal property; securing 24 megahertz of
broadcast spectrum for state and local emergency communications; and
filing amicus briefs on behalf of cities and towns with the Supreme Court
and circuit courts of appeal seeking to protect local authority in areas
ranging from wireless communications to railroads to crime.

Now, dues-paying members of CTIA and PCIA, can your beer do
that?

No doubt, the wireless industry believes NLC's railroading of the
Tauzin-McCain E911 federal land antenna-siting bill was a crime.

But don't look to Vice President Gore, who addressed the NLC last
Friday, for help. The veep's not about to rock the boat with mayors and
county commissioners over antenna siting. Why, he's busy pulling
together his 2000 presidential campaign team.

Speaking of which, seems those advising Gore have pressing
business—some involving wireless telecom—before the federal
government.

Take ex-Gore domestic policy adviser Greg Simon, who lobbies for
wireless and other telecom sectors these days. Simon, who arranged a
key White House meeting with MCHI representatives on a big LEO
license that's under investigation by an independent counsel, told
Associated Press reporter Jonathan D. Salant last week that lobbying
and Gore advice-giving are kept separate.

Also in Gore's orbit is Peter Knight, a lobbyist implicated in the Portals
probe and various campaign finance investigations. Knight ran the '96
Clinton-Gore campaign and supposedly is in the running for Gore 2000
campaign chairman.

Then there's Roy Neel, president of the United States Telephone
Association and a former Gore chief of staff. (It hasn't helped the firmly
entrenched Baby Bells enter the long-distance market.)

Not to be overlooked is none other than Tom Downey, a former New
York Dem congressman who does the bidding for L.M. Ericsson in the
nation's capital. (Some predict his close ties to Gore's camp will keep
the U.S. from ultimately taking serious action against the EU for locking
out CDMA technology.)

The campaign finance stuff would be old hat had it not been
incorporated into the House's impeachment inquiry last week.

Speaking of scandal, more fireworks on alleged U.S.-China technology
transfers. Lt. Col. Al Coates, who after 29 years quit the Air Force out
of frustration with the lack of U.S. government support in monitoring
American satellite firms in China, told ABC 20/20's Chris Wallace the
administration ignored numerous reports of infractions by Hughes
Electronics Co. and others that Coates believes compromised national
security.

Rep. Chris Cox (R-Calif.), chairman of the select House panel on
high-tech exports to China, will submit a classified report to Congress
Jan. 2. The redacted version is expected to be public in February.

VIEWPOINT
By Tracy Ford
Get ready, the wireless world as we know it is going to change—again.

When we look back at 1998 in wireless to see which announcements
impacted the industry, it may very well be the recent alliances in wireless
data were the yeast that caused the wireless data bread to rise.

But the rise of wireless data very well could change how operators and
vendors function, so say experts. Carriers and vendors traditionally have
been partners in directing the future of wireless services. It sounds like
they will give up some of that control in exchange for growth in the
wireless data industry.

The Internet is changing the world. Pick up a consumer newspaper and
within a week, you will find an article about online shopping this holiday
season.

The terms e-commerce and I-commerce are starting to become more
familiar as Generation X redefines shopping into something done less at
the mall and more on the keyboard. Barnes & Noble is featuring its
virtual bookstore in its advertising this season. MasterCard also is
jumping onboard. Its holiday advertising features a mother playing with
the kids at home, shopping online, instead of running to stores.

So as the explosion in wireless data launches, the wireless industry
should be prepared for a little less control over an emerging
marketplace.

Jane Zweig, an executive at research company Herschel Shosteck
Associates Ltd., predicts, ‘‘Competing infrastructures, participants and
technologies from the three network industries—wireless, landline and
the Internet—will eventually destroy traditional views of wireless.''

‘‘Applications in the future wireless market will be defined by corporate
users and the Internet—not by network operators or terminal
manufacturers ... In the traditional wireless model, the network operator
largely controlled the end user—in terminal sales, distribution channels,
value services, (and) tariffs, to name a few. ‘Ownership of the customer'
will be the first concept to die in the new wireless world,'' Zweig
commented.

Wow. Another paradigm shift. Who'd have thunk it?



Copyright 1998, all rights reserved.
Please report problems to webmaster.rcr@inlet.com
December 7, 1998
rcrnews.com




To: DaveMG who wrote (19239)12/7/1998 9:37:00 PM
From: SKIP PAUL  Respond to of 152472
 
DaveMG Yes I believe The Open interest Numbers are updated. The raid failed in my view because Qcom held firm at 52 1/2 and was down only a fraction for the day.

Regards