SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Trinity Biotech (TRIBY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hope who wrote (11244)12/8/1998 9:09:00 AM
From: AgAuUSA  Respond to of 14328
 
Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Update

Heavy Usage of HIV Home Test Kits By At-Risk Groups

New Brunswick, NJ, February 11, 1997
The home blood-collection HIV test kits, approved for use last year, are reaching
the target population--those at high-risk for HIV infection, according to an article
in the February issue of AIDS Alert.

"The response has been very broad-based," reports Arisa Cunningham, director of
marketing, at Direct Access Diagnostics in, the company that makes Confide. "We
have had great response among African-Americans, Hispanics, and gay men.....a
mirror of the groups hit hardest by the epidemic." The average age of the Confide
user is between 18 and 34 years, she added.

These observations were echoed by a spokesperson from Home Access Health,
another HIV test manufacturer. FDA requires that the companies that sell the HIV
home tests gather demographic data and report them to the CDC.

The test manufacturers' telephone counselors also get "good marks," Dr. Bernard
Branson of the CDC said. Also, individuals who send in the home test kits are for
the most part using them correctly. One company estimates that about 99% blood
samples received thus far were adequate for HIV testing.

Based on preliminary data, about 1% to 1.5% of the blood samples that are tested
are HIV seropositive, which is a bit higher than anticipated, Dr. Branson said.
According to estimates from publicly funded HIV test sites, which target high-risk
populations, the overall HIV seroprevalence is about 2%.

Go to the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Update Menu

Go to the NewsLine Main Menu

Go to the HIVpositive.com Main Menu

hivpositive.com



To: Hope who wrote (11244)12/8/1998 9:12:00 AM
From: AgAuUSA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14328
 


Newly approved AIDS test gives instantaneous
result

by Chelsea J. Carter
The Associated Press

ATLANTA - The government is recommending a new HIV test that yields results
instantly instead of a week later.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said yesterday the rapid test will
address a major drawback to the current method: Nearly 700,000 people a year never
return to find out their test results.

AIDS advocates said the new test means more people will get prompt education and
treatment.

"Most people either don't want to or are afraid to deal with it unless they become
sick," said Tony Braswell, executive director of AIDS Atlanta. "If you can tell
someone while they are sitting there, talking with a counselor, you could get a head
start with them. You know, tell them that their life is not over."

Only one rapid test has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use
in clinics in the United States. The test, manufactured by Murex of Norcross, takes
about 10 minutes to determine whether the virus is present. Several other tests are
awaiting FDA approval.

Both the new and the old tests look for antibodies in the blood. However, the
traditional, one-week test also looks for specific protein bands, which are considered
the absolute indicator of HIV.

About 8,000 people would initially receive false-positive results from the new test,
said Bernard Branson, an epidemiologist and the chief architect of the CDC's
recommendation. In contrast, the current one-week test is nearly 100 percent accurate.

"It's clearly a risk messing with people's psyche - telling them they are HIV-positive.
But you have to ask whether the benefit outweighs the risk," he said. "I think it could
be considered a public-health emergency to have 8,000 people with HIV walking
around and not knowing it."

The CDC estimated the new test would allow health officials to notify 8,000 more
infected people each year.

More than 2 million people are tested anonymously each year for the AIDS virus, but
a third of them never bother to check the results.









Copyright © 1998 The Seattle Times Company

Posted at 05:44 a.m. PST; Friday, March 27, 1998

seattletimes.com



To: Hope who wrote (11244)12/8/1998 9:20:00 AM
From: AgAuUSA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14328
 


April 1, 1998
Gene therapy a new frontier in HIV fight
By Lisa Krieger
OF THE EXAMINER STAFF

THIS WEEK, Bay Area volunteers are participating in the first study of the safety and
feasibility of genetically modified blood cells designed to fight HIV infection.

Patients receive an infusion of their own cells, which have been modified to include a mutant
gene that interferes with the ability of HIV to reproduce. The experiment is being conducted by
the AIDS Community Research Consortium in Redwood City.

"Gene therapy is a potentially exciting
new approach to treating a number of
diseases that have resisted treatment in the
past, including HIV infection and various
cancers," said Dr. Stan Deresinski,
principal investigator of the study.

Jacqui Sheffield is a study participant.
When she was diagnosed with HIV, she
said to herself, "AIDS equals death.
That's what I thought. I immediately
thought about my beautiful son and I
began to imagine not being able to see him
grow up. After months of feeling sorry
for myself, I decided to take action."

Now she is taking combination therapies
and volunteering in the gene therapy
study. Her participation will help
scientists understand the process of
"harvesting" blood cells called stem cells,
which are the primary generators of
immune cells that fight disease. The consortium trial is the first to test the potential of stem
cell-based gene therapy.

"I wanted to take part in some of the newer approaches to treat HIV infection, so that some day
all patients may be helped," Sheffield said.

Chemokine protection

Fourteen hemophiliacs who were repeatedly exposed to HIV resisted infection because they
had high levels of immune system proteins called chemokines, a study suggests.

The study involved 128 hemophiliacs who had repeatedly been exposed to HIV from blood
products from 1980 to 1985. Only three were infected by the first infusions. The total number
of those infected rose to 59 in 1982, 84 in 1983, 103 in 1984 and 114 in 1985.

The pattern shows that most hemophiliacs had a natural -- but temporary -- resistance to HIV
infection, The Associated Press reported.

Blood cells taken from them were found to produce about twice as much of three kinds of
chemokines as did cells from healthy blood donors, or from hemophiliacs unexposed to HIV,
according to the research, reported by Dr. Daniel Zagury, of the Pierre and Marie Curie
University in Paris; Alessandro Gringeri, of the University of Milan in Italy; and Dr. Robert
Gallo of the Institute of Human Virology at the University of Maryland in the latest issue of the
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Prior studies have shown that chemokines can block HIV infection in the test tube, and
scientists have been hoping to use them to develop AIDS drugs or a vaccine.

Monkey viruses

U.S. researchers reported this week that they have evidence that people can be infected with
monkey viruses -- including one laboratory worker who got infected with SIV, the monkey
equivalent of the HIV virus that causes AIDS in humans.

The findings have implications for research into xenotransplants, animal-to-human organ
transplants, said researcher Walid Heneine of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, who reported his findings in the journal Nature Medicine.

Heneine tested the blood of 231 lab workers who handled monkeys and found that five had
become infected with monkey viruses. One was SIV and four were infected with a simian
foamy virus, common in laboratory monkeys.

They were not harmful in any of these people, he said.

But researchers fear that people given an organ of an animal might catch an animal virus that
turns dangerous.

"The impact on xenotransplants is that, yes, we have documentation that people who receive
xenotransplants from SIV-infected baboons may very likely get infected with SIV virus, but
we don't have any evidence that it will harm them," Heneine told Reuters.

The viruses came from an African green monkey and from baboons. All the infected lab
workers reported suffering injuries, such as bites from the monkeys.

But the workers did not get sick. Nor did their spouses. Tests of old blood donated by the
workers found that one was infected for at least 20 years and another for nine years.

Robin Weiss, an expert in viruses at the Institute of Cancer Research in London, said viruses
have been hopping from animals to humans for generations, but rarely cause an epidemic.
HIV, thought to have mutated from SIV, is a major exception.

But he added in a commentary in Nature Medicine that "we understand all too little about what
allows viruses to adopt and spread in a new host."

New test

The government is recommending use of a new HIV test that yields results instantly instead of
a week later.

The CDC says the rapid test will address a major drawback of the current method: Nearly
700,000 people a year never return to find out their test results. And because they are tested
anonymously, there is no way for clinics to call and inform them of their infection.

The new test means that more people will be able to get prompt education and treatment.

"Most people either don't want to or are afraid to deal with it unless they become sick," said
Tony Braswell, executive director of AIDS Atlanta. "If you can tell someone while they are
sitting there, talking with a counselor, you could get a head start with them . . . and tell them
that their life is not over."

The test, manufactured by Murex of Norcross, takes about 10 minutes to determine whether
the virus is present. Both the new and the old tests look for antibodies in the blood. However,
the traditional, one-week test also looks for specific protein bands, which are considered the
absolute indicator of HIV.

About 8,000 people annually would initially receive false-positive results from the new test,
said Bernard Branson of the CDC. In contrast, the current one-week test is nearly 100 percent
accurate.

To combat false results, clinics give three quick HIV tests. If one or more comes back with a
positive reading, a traditional blood test is taken and the results are made available in about
seven days.

The toll

Jon M. Gilreath, 46, a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Michigan State University with an MBA
from UC-Berkeley who then became an executive at California Public Radio and Pacific Bell .
. . Douglas A. Smith, 50, a Massachusetts native who was director for the Social Security
Administration for 24 years.

The Examiner | AIDSWEEK main page
examiner.com



To: Hope who wrote (11244)12/8/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: Scott H. Davis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14328
 
FYI To All: I read an interesting article in Bloomberg about the "January Effect". The found that, going back years, the average microcap gain in Jan was 8.6 %, small caps 4.6 large caps 1.9 (figures out of memory but I believe these are at least close). Main reasons was tax loss selling, particularly by institutions in Sept/Oct, followed by subsequest re-purchases, and a "new optimism" the new year brings. Among small & micro caps, they found the biggest effect in stocks < $10.00, and sound healthcare on of the top 3 sectors.

Obviously TRIBY fits the criteria fairly well. They also noted January effect crawling into December in the case of re-purchases by institutions. (There ya go, a positive, informational, non-editorial post) Scott