Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carl Held who wrote (69614)	12/8/1998 10:56:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 186894

Carl, RE:"The new price target from Morgan Stanley Dean Witter is ridculous. You might as well say price target of $250. This should be a crime, total manipulation. " OK...$250 See, I told you you should have bought and "Held". <G> Jim

To: Carl Held who wrote (69614)	12/8/1998 11:11:00 AM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 186894

>>>The new price target from Morgan Stanley Dean Witter is ridculous. You might as well say price target of $250. This should be a crime, total manipulation.<<< If that doesn't sound like sour grapes, I'd like to know what does. Knock yourself out with your shorts.

To: Carl Held who wrote (69614)	12/8/1998 11:23:00 AM
From: greg s	Respond to of 186894

Carl, re:This should be a crime Your "crime" is believing your own hyperbole. Enjoy your shorts (probably feeling more like a wedgie now, eh?) It's not too late to go long, Carl. Your target of $250. could yield a nice return <VBG> Greg.

To: Carl Held who wrote (69614)	12/8/1998 11:28:00 AM
From: exhon2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

carl: re <<This should be a crime, total manipulation.>> You post that "the end is coming" crap on multiple threads and have the huevos to call Morgan Stanley's call a crime. Why don't you act on your own crap, buy a couple of tons of grain, canned foods and ammunition. When the Y2K bug kills everything larger than bacteria you and your family could be living the good life in a cave in Baja.

To: Carl Held who wrote (69614)	12/8/1998 11:38:00 AM
From: GVTucker	Respond to of 186894

Carl, RE:<<This should be a crime, total manipulation.>> I am one of the least optimistic people on this thread when it comes to Intel, and you are giving us pessimists a bad name. Intel's price action is doing a good enough job of that on its own, your help is not needed. Since when is it manipulation to state an opinion? Edelstone is forcing no one to believe him. If his target is way off, his credibility will suffer, and his statements will begin to have less impact. Kurlak was one of the few people who predicted that business would slow about a year and a half ago. He overplayed his hand, however, and his words for the time being have little impact on the price of Intel. Edelstone was correct in predicted the trough in Intel's business. If he is overreaching now, the market will take care of him just fine, no prosecution for his "crime" is necessary.

To: Carl Held who wrote (69614)	12/8/1998 3:04:00 PM
From: Diamond Jim	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

"The new price target from Morgan Stanley Dean Witter is ridculous. You might as well say price target of $250. This should be a crime, total manipulation." ++++++++++ At least his analysis is in line with what Intel is saying, I think the real manipulation is what Kurlak does, but then I am not a Merrill Lynched manipulatee. jim