SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BlueFox who wrote (16803)12/8/1998 1:03:00 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18444
 
BlueFox, if 10 people are posting negatively and I, personally, believe they have no basis in fact for doing so, how then do I become the villain for asking for proof. Indeed, I am the positive speculator--I ask my questions in the possibility that what happened did not occur due to nefarious reasons.

Meanwhile, the Negheads almost always use nefarious reasons behind their negative posting, as if everything that has happened is due to a scheme against them. Indeed, I stand out because it's a 10 to one ratio against what I write about. Does this bother me? Nope. I am only bothered when something is absolutely proven and it goes against what I thought to be be so.

In times past? Well, you know as well as anyone that you cannot apply statements made in the past, which were made respective to the reality of that past, to the present reality. To attempt to do so is a distortion at best.

I've already succinctly stated that I initially thought Zulu would rise fast. Indeed, if you re-examine the whole past, you'll find past Zulu stock charts which would have supported this. Consequently, I've concluded that more foundation work needs to happen in order for Zulu to become successful. And so why should I be criticized simply because I choose not to yell at the bricklayers while they do their work?

Why not instead address CWII comments regarding Zulu? Don't skip over his remarks just to go another round at me. CWII's been around as long as I have. How did he come to his view?



To: BlueFox who wrote (16803)12/8/1998 2:22:00 PM
From: Fredman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18444
 
i have NO PROBLEM saying i bought in at .05 a couple of months ago, because i figured it would go to .10 and i'd sell. Instead, it went to .20, and i sold at over .10 and less than .20. I didn't buy because i thought the company would turn around, i bought simply because i figured it would climb back up to .10, and NO OTHER REASON ASIDE FROM THAT. I hope nobody thinks i screwed 'em....