SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WavePhore (WAVO)- VBI fed WaveTop for WebTV -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MrLuckyman who wrote (2352)12/8/1998 3:20:00 PM
From: Kevin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2843
 
Maybe its just me, but I don't remember 1/2 those questions being asked. As I recall the interview focused on cash position and profitability and nothing on the technology itself. But even considering the cash position/profitability issue Deeds could have done better as well.

Of course, I would be happy to stand corrected.



To: MrLuckyman who wrote (2352)12/8/1998 4:08:00 PM
From: Lynn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2843
 
I did not see the interview, but a reading of the questions Deeds was asked in the letter you share makes me think Deeds blew the interview. Whatever Cramer said before the interview, Deeds could have come out of the interview making WAVO smell like a rose. The questions asked in the interview don't look like those a person trying to gun-down a company would ask.

_Very_ informative is the section of the letter when Deeds was invited back to CNBC and turned-down the offer. Had he felt Cramer screwed him over, he should definitely have accepted the invitation and returned.

Lynn



To: MrLuckyman who wrote (2352)12/8/1998 4:25:00 PM
From: James J. Cramer  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 2843
 
If asking someone about his business plan and prospects is "taking a gun out and shooting someone" what would have happened if I had asked about past sales?
jjc