Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : JAWS Technologies - NASDAQ (NM):JAWZ -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: justaninvestor who wrote (1383)	12/8/1998 9:52:00 PM
From: Phantom Dialer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3086

2 Things..... 1. Regarding the crpytoanalyst analyzation that I think calypso brought up again....yesI would like it too, but we need an UNBIASED analyst to do it...not Bruce. Someone like a Ziff-Davis or another truly "non partisan group"....surely you would never pay FORD $ to analyze a GM car and expect a good unbiased report. 2. Regarding share dilution, I am still strongly against it, especially at these levels....I would rather see the company use an alternative form of investment--i.e. a straight bond offering even it it fell into the "junk" catagory or high yield...whether it is floated to a high net worth indivudual or public I don't care. I just think there are other ways to raise capital than rushing in and tapping the equity markets.... This might sound like the stupidest idea but I don't know if the company even considered "buying back" some shares...at these low prices...float a bond or something for some capital...or even instead of interest payments offer a set # of shares in return for borrowing capital...thus not disrupting the current float... I would think that any large shareholder would normally strongly against such share dilution (50%). I hope what Barrie has brought up isn't something that will occur in the near future and isnt a foreshadowing of things to come... Phantom