Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Impristine who wrote (1925)	12/9/1998 8:56:00 AM
From: timroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27722

Wednesday December 9 8:22 AM ET Falling into the short-sellers trap By Christopher Byron Have you been watching in baffled amazement - day after day and week after week - as the entire market seems to turn around in the last hour of trading and erupt in a frenzy of buying, with the Internet stocks leading the day? For the big cap stocks, the favored explanation for these abrupt reversals and seemingly random spurts, often boils down to so-called program trading. But for the thinly traded stocks of the Internet sector, it's not program trading at all that's at work. Instead, it's naked short-selling by investors who rightly see that the sector is over-priced, but are simply aggravating the situation - while costing themselves dearly in the process - by putting on positions that can't close out. For a classic text-book case on how this works look at the recent trading history in Navarre Corp., a Minnesota music and software wholesaling company. The company has balance sheet cash of only $19,000, with ballooning account receivables that equal 66 percent of total assets, a six-week inventory of merchandise that is costly to finance yet could become obsolete and worthless at any minute, deepening losses on shrinking revenues that are currently running at $200 million annually, with total balance sheet equity of only $23.4 million, and that is burning through its cash at a rate of $50 million a year. Oh yes, and let's throw in one other thing. Only a month ago the company was selling for a mere $3 per share yet today is selling for 4.5 times that much, giving the business a market value of $147.6 million on Wall Street whereas it was worth less than $50 million just a few weeks earlier. Given all that, wouldn't you want to reach for the phone, call up your broker, and say, "Boy, have I got a stock for you to short!? Sounds like a no-lose proposition, to be sure. But plenty of otherwise smart investors had their heads handed to them Monday on just that idea. They tried to "short" a deeply troubled - and wildly over-priced - stock and wound up causing the stock's already-overheated price to rise even further. When trading in NASDAQ stocks finally ended, Navarre had racked up the biggest percentage gain of the day on any major exchange - a nearly 70 percent price explosion in the face of broad market averages that barely budged at all. What happened? Navarre is a wholesaler to the consumer market - a difficult, low-margin business in the best of times. But Navarre is especially vulnerable thanks to its dependence on the unpredictable contemporary music scene. It has thus thrown resources into its CD-ROM business, but the margins there aren't great either. As a result - and mainly it would seem to shed a money- losing business at what it hopes will be a sky-high price - the company has lately been hinting that it is planning an IPO spin-off of a division it had acquired the previous year to provide radio programming over the Internet. The business has never made a dime for Navarre, and the company has cautioned investors in government filings that the business may never turn a profit either. But in the frenzied state of the Internet market, such warnings are quickly discounted by investors, who think the stock will rise simply on the basis of its connection to the Internet. So they buy it, and the price does rise - though common sense says that if the business were actually worth something as a business, Navarre wouldn't be selling it in the first place. In this situation - and many other like it as well - the would-be short-sellers have been making a classic mistake: they've been attempting to cash in on the company's over-heated share price by "naked short-selling." That is, they've been selling shares they haven't actually been able to acquire later on in case rising demand made "covering" the short positions necessary. The tell-tale clue in the case of Navarre on Monday? As a hedge fund manager in San Francisco explained to me, the approach of the end of trading on Monday caused back-office clerks in brokerage firms all over Wall Street to begin the routine process of exercising forced "buy-ins" to close out uncovered short positions in accounts which shares had been promised for delivery but hadn't actually been delivered. By the dynamics of the market, this process caused Navarre's price - which had opened strong but had held fairly stable thereafter for most of the day - to begin to rise strongly in the final hour of trading. This in turn encouraged day traders and momentum hedge fund operators everywhere to pile into the stock. Result? Nearly a third of the stock's total trading volume of 13 million shares for the day took place in the final 60 minutes, and Navarre ended the session with powerful upward momentum. Does this sort of thing seem familiar to you? "This is going on constantly," says my source. "These guys are just walking into the same trap day after day, and it's causing the entire sector to shoot into orbit. It's not just individual stocks but an entire sector of the stock market that's now caught in a short squeeze. If you're 'long' these stocks it's the payday of a lifetime. If you're short it's a calamity." My friend says this will all end soon enough, and that in the end, pricing stability will prevail - because, in the end, it always does. But, he says, anyone trying to short these stocks now is just asking for trouble. As I wrote in this space not long ago, we've entered the final phase of extreme excess in the current bull market. But that phase isn't ending yet-in fact it may only be just beginning. Meanwhile, if an Internet stock is over-priced, don't think you're looking at an invitation for a short-sale. You're probably just looking at a "sucker's short" instead. Click here for more business news from MSNBC.

To: Impristine who wrote (1925)	12/9/1998 8:57:00 AM
From: changedmyname	Respond to of 27722

I already read that negative article... it is an OPINION. I respect his opinion just as much as I respect the opinions of all the shorts on Yahoo (which is very, very, very, very little). Good luck to all today. Jason

To: Impristine who wrote (1925)	12/9/1998 8:59:00 AM
From: ayahuasca	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27722

I dont think the writer of this article like internet stocks at all. So while he highlights NAVR he could have done it with a host of other companies as well. His arguments apply to the entire internet sector and, in the short term, I dont see that collapsing. In the end the cream of the internet crop will rise to the top. Right now bets are being placed as to who will succeed in the single most important invention or tool to come along in, well, quite a long time. The future will be a much different place than the past and one mistake I think alot of people make is judging businesses based on the old models. It is a new world out there now. As to NAVR, we shall see what they can make of this opportunity.