SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CheckFree Holdings Corp. (CKFR), the next Dell, Intel? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brooks Jackson who wrote (567)12/9/1998 12:01:00 PM
From: TLindt  Respond to of 20297
 
There are even more question to go with the origional.

Lets say you are a Bank and paying $5.00 a head a month for paper Checkfree service to offer your customers....as the customers biller move to e-bill...will CheckFree be cutting up the e-bill revenue stream with the bank? I think they should....because that's how portal agreements work...the Vendor/Supplier of the service usually pays the portal compensation...one part of that mix is for Branding, and the other part is a transactional royalty if you will based on volume.

The Branding part would be out most likely, as they Banks what you to think they do the Magic. But I could see where a royalty should cancel out the $5 fee over time on the paper end of CheckFree, and that in the end the Banks too would make a profit on this service.

In addition I think the Banks the best salesmen to potential presenters....ie they should get an over-ride comission % on their billing customers they turn over to CheckFrees Services.

Best way to make this work long-term is to feed the supply chain with some of that cash....cut the Bank partners in for a % of the revenues and this thing would move a lot faster, meet with less resistance, and be more secure going long term. 20-25% is not out of the question for starters...and then tier it down from there. Banks Love Fee Income.

If they are not paying the Banks...they should be...IMO.