SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (17856)12/9/1998 2:15:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<You think they should haul up Bill Gates on perjury? You think his deposition was somehow more honest than Clinton's?>>

Excellent point Dan. Actually, I think the more examples of powerful and elite people we can find, not being held accountable by the legal system, the more likely we will be able to water down the justice system and redefine it simply on the basis of fiscal measurement.



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (17856)12/9/1998 2:35:00 PM
From: mrknowitall  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
1: "You think they should haul up Bill Gates on perjury?" 2: "You think his deposition was somehow more honest than Clinton's?"

1. If they have substantive evidence that he lied under oath, yes, he should be charged with perjury and brought to trial.

2. There you go again - the two cases have no bearing on each other and an attempt to defend Clinton's lying with any other case is still irrelevant (and typical of WH propaganda).

Mr. K.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News