Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Machaon who wrote (17868)	12/9/1998 2:36:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Madame Tussaud forced to modify an exhibit that was a little too lifelike: ''The figures are very accessible and people tend to get up close to get their photographs taken. We were finding that every time we went past Bill Clinton the zipper was undone,'' said the exhibitor's general manager Vicky Brown. dailynews.yahoo.com

To: Machaon who wrote (17868)	12/9/1998 2:38:00 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 67261

Sheesh, are you a republican phobe?

To: Machaon who wrote (17868)	12/9/1998 2:52:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Robert, your apparent understanding of the "legal system" is hopelessly (as well as politically) flawed. Of your first five items, would you care to point out for us why the Justice Department isn't pursuing any of those? Keeping in mind, of course, that head of the Justice Department (the Attorney General - a Democrat - working at the behest and direction of the White House) hasn't seen fit to bring any charges. Might it be that your opinion of what is or was illegal is just a bit skewed? Seems to me you should have more faith in your Attorney General and her illustrious boss when it comes to fighting back against the supposed "elite." Mr. K.

To: Machaon who wrote (17868)	12/9/1998 2:59:00 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Maybe even I would think getting a BJ in the White house would be cool. I'm sure many a President has. I don't give a hoot about it. I wonder if KENNEDY would have allowed himself to defame particular American women if the mere rumors had been made public, let alone proof like a stained dress? Perhaps? Forget the courts, when a President breaks his oath to uphold the constitution and defames American Women over his personal peckingdildos by making a public statement(during which he is clearly on the job and hence, under oath), he has committed an OBVIOUS impeachable offense. I'll say it again. If a President DEFAMES an American Citizen as a liar in a public pronouncement when he knows she is not- it breaks his oath and is impeachable. The effect of this activity affects her reputation and life- and from on high! From on HIGEST! Such activity by a President is impeachable for sure. If it were just between he and his wife, i.e. she found out and he admitted it- who cares? THIS is VERY much a different thing.