SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jim kelley who wrote (84415)12/9/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: Fangorn  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 176387
 
Jim,

ROFLOL

Where have you been? VBG

Name calling? You mean Slick or Clintonistas? Guilty, yes I am.



To: jim kelley who wrote (84415)12/9/1998 4:14:00 PM
From: Fangorn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
OT

Jim,

Even Ben-Veniste (sp) said yesterday that he "had problems" with Clinton's grand jury testimony. The other lawyer on his panel (Hamilton ?) agreed that he also "had problems" with that testimony.

They both argued that perjury in this case did not rise to an impeachable offense. Neither argued, wisely IMO, that no perjury was committed. I respectfully disagree with their position but find the "There was no perjury" argument ludicrous.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News