SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Audio and Radio on the Internet- NAVR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: thomas a. burke who wrote (1999)12/9/1998 4:26:00 PM
From: Bald Man from Mars  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27722
 
You already get burnt once, are you sure you want to play with fire again ???



To: thomas a. burke who wrote (1999)12/9/1998 4:28:00 PM
From: MUL  Respond to of 27722
 
Good News !!!! as the market about to close at around 12:55 PST
CNBC mentioned that NAVR was a strange stock today, people sell off when CEO didn't mention any thing about IPO but then he said NAVR will file an IPO within 60 days. Back up your truck now !!



To: thomas a. burke who wrote (1999)12/9/1998 4:33:00 PM
From: TH  Respond to of 27722
 
Thomas,

Sorry to hear you paid 16. Its easy to do when it looks like it going for the rocket ride.

I must say, I thought Haines was soft on Paulsen. I have seen Haines make some of these guys wish they had Depends on. No Paulsen is to blame for this, and yes it cost me some too. At least on my last trade. Paulsen showed well, but he did not sell the sexy sizzle of the IPO. Give the people what they want. They did not get it from Paulsen, just some wholesale/retail tangent that does not want to make people light the fuse.

I was disappointed to see that it did not hold 10, because I thought the committed longs would just do the 60 days time and wait for the IPO. It does however present you with a recovery mode. Your plan to buy back at 5 is pretty solid, and I plan to do the same. I don't know if it will get to 5, but I think, based on todays close, that we will see low 7 in the next week.

I plan to load up and cash out on the first, and probably best, up wave.

Good Luck to all the longs. This horse will make that ride someday soon.



To: thomas a. burke who wrote (1999)12/9/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: gammaray  Respond to of 27722
 
Disagree totally. Interview was great. Only one problem and it had nothing to do with interview per se. he did not hype ipo.

Neil



To: thomas a. burke who wrote (1999)12/9/1998 5:50:00 PM
From: Alexander20  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27722
 
Heres hoping you never get a chance
to get this stock at $5.



To: thomas a. burke who wrote (1999)12/9/1998 6:34:00 PM
From: Stephen Adnan  Respond to of 27722
 
NAVR longs will be rewarded

Everyone has seen the volatility of this issue and everyone is planning to get in on any share price swings.

Trading NAVR on bottoms could have made a novice a LARGE fortune in the past year.

Every stock, except those going bankrupt or large insider selleing, etc., that I have seen in which there are a large amount of traders ALL waiting to buy at the bottom - does NOT find that bottom.

The 30-60 days statement by to file IPO, the net IPO potential, the fact that many know that net IPOs (good values or not) sour, the market's frenzy to get in, and the daytraders- especially the day traders who are feasting on this volatility and the shorts all meant that everyone here will not casually be able to wait the for the bottom to enter a stock with the PRESS and possible potential share price appreciation of a NAVR.

You set a GTC buy at $5, I will at $5.5, someone else will at $6, and so, so on , so on. I am NOT saying this will rocket to $40 - but this volatility will simply continue as margin players, then short, continually find themselves on the wrong side of the trades.

Remember, the reason there is no January effect NOW, is that everyone is buying in December positioning themselves for the January effect.

How can it go to five if EVERYONE WANTS TO GET IN AT $5 and sell at $8-$12-$25???

Play the volatility , but this is a gamble.

Stephen



To: thomas a. burke who wrote (1999)12/9/1998 6:35:00 PM
From: Stephen Adnan  Respond to of 27722