Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (17979)	12/9/1998 9:13:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

In his personal life, he has no respect for women. That's why he exploits them so.

To: Dan B. who wrote (17979)	12/9/1998 10:01:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<< For crying out loud, "bog him down for years" get real here, eh? >> We will see in a couple of years if special interest groups and political groups use Civil proceedings to attack the next President. In the mean time, I hope that the Supreme Court overturns that ruling. Get real??? Obviously you think that politicians are angels and would never stoop to underhanded means to push their own goals.

To: Dan B. who wrote (17979)	12/9/1998 10:13:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

You're right on the lack of respect for Americans, Dan - the self-appointed liberal king-makers are loathe to open the proposed presidential monarchy to the wiles of the now "minority" conservative dissident commoners. It is the ultimate expression of today's socialism to put a president/king into place with a same-party congress to preclude opposing influence. Funny how so many of those on this service (SI) are so willing to risk their very financial futures to those who are so bent on making everyone "equal" whether they earned it or not. Is this the dawn of some kind of Kafkaesque "socialized capitalism" or are the supporters of Bill Clinton and his shamed legacy just so two faced that they post here to keep the propaganda mill primed? Mr. K.

To: Dan B. who wrote (17979)	12/10/1998 12:15:00 AM
From: Borzou Daragahi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

The man has no respect for the rights of MANY American women, and would rather defame them than fess up to his deeds- that's clear. IT's disgusting- not his sex drive- but rather his gutless defamation of others who have been touched by it. Dan, Bill has a lack of respect not just for the rights of American women, but for all who stand in the way of his political ambitions. In that sense, he is no different from that other Bill we read about in the papers every day. And in that sense, Bill&Bill perfectly capture the reckless, ambitious, yuppie ethos of the day. Still, because of his record on women's issues--his solid pro-choice stance, his unprecedented appointment of women to high-level cabinet positions--he has greater support among women than among men. regards'