Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bid.com International (BIDS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steelguy who wrote (3382)	12/9/1998 11:46:00 PM
From: Sili Investor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37507

sg, I appreciate your view on this IR guy. I will tell you my experience. In most cases, an IR person is allowed to state anything that is already "public domain". As you said, he's a "paid mouthpiece". As a result, he can state what Godin has already said. And, if I'm not mistaken, Godin has already said that he is was in New York to do a "cable" deal. Now, if F. Evans was accurate in his reporting, this IR guy Tim, stated that Godin jumped the gun but, in fact, that he was CONFIRMING what Godin had already stated. Nothing "material" about that since it was already public domain. Of course, I didn't talk to Tim although I will start the search tomorrow for Tim. I will also report back if I have any success.

To: Steelguy who wrote (3382)	12/10/1998 9:51:00 AM
From: Mr. Forthright	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 37507

Any reason why the stock is going down?

To: Steelguy who wrote (3382)	12/10/1998 6:30:00 PM
From: F. Evans	Respond to of 37507

>>IF THAT WERE TRUE...it would be considered " material " << Opinion taken Steelguy but isn't Godin's apparent slip up on the CBC and the other news story published by the financial post considered as somewhat of a news release anyway? Technically speaking of course. That would mean that what this IR guy is confirming is mere facts that we already know. IMO Frank

To: Steelguy who wrote (3382)	12/11/1998 10:17:00 PM
From: Gator	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37507

You want a Real Deal with no BII HYPE...the NASDAQ BII story is crap...now check this out, see what all the talk at Yahoo, from EBAY to Lucent Boards are calling the next Super Stock...the following was found on the SNMM board here at SI... >>>> I cant wait till investors find out who has the real deal. Some folks fall in love with certain stocks, especially if it made them or someone else alot of money in a short time. Thats not all bad, but when the company posts news release after news release(sometimes the same) projects astronomical forecasts with stock hypsters and runs a printing press right under your nose, you think something would be wrong. Thank God I realized that. This company did over 39 Million in Gross Revenues(wagers,leesing software, other) in October ALONE. I repeat 39 Million. That is incredible. Take that times 12 and you get $468 Mil annualized in Gross revenues. Not bad for its site being up only a few months. If SNMM would post these figures now this stock would be at least $10 in no time. SNMM is only at .90 cents. This is an incredible bargain. There are only 25 Mil shares outstanding with 9 Mil in the float. With all options and warrents exercised there would be 35 Mil outstanding. You do the math. At the very least I see $.90 EPS. Again at the very least. I am taking 25Mil current shares X 5% net profit margin which is probably way low. 10% net profit margin you have $1.80 EPS. Its probably somewhere in between. needless to say I am very BULLISH on this company more so than any other I have seen. Im see $75 Mil Touted annual projection touted by GGNC and there stock is over $3. We should do over $450 Mil which is 6 times GGNC, so by comparison our stock would be $20.INCREDIBLE >>>> Later...Gator