Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (18006)	12/10/1998 1:24:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<< And most lawyers agree that throwing the Jones case out was a serious legal mistake by the judge. >> Just be glad that you are not under oath. <g> I do not like the fact that Clinton paid off Jones, but, there was a possibility that an appeals court would reinstate the case, even if it did not have any merit. And, then Clinton would have to testify again under oath creating one hell of a perjury trap! What do you think? If the case was reinstated, would the payoff price have been more than $850,000? Of course it would!