SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (18023)12/10/1998 7:37:00 AM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 67261
 
Oh yes Michelle of the stereotype foundry, I know her opinions well indeed. We don't always agree- I'm far more Libertarian indeed.

However this anecdotal gal of mine never had and doesn't want a child, she like me believes abortion should be an individual choice, and health/sex education is unquestionably just right by her. Politically she adamantly has no use for the man. Government and abortion shouldn't mix, you see. She knows a female defaming gutless weasel when she sees one. She has done payroll and/or billing for several corporations and a Hospital.
Like me she'd like bible toters to stay far away from her, thank-you. Unlike me she can't even say she believes in a creator. She knows the right to bear arms was a smart thing to put in the constitution, and that studies done expressly to show gun control laws decrease crime have actually proven the opposite to the chagrin of those doing the research.
"Soon we will become the first modern society to have complete registration of all handguns- our people will be safer and we will lead the world into a new era of peace and prosperity"(I paraphrase)-Adolph Hitler. And by the by, I have never owned a gun in my life and don't care to- but she does for protection she says. Satisfied?
Any President who uses his public trust to knowingly wrongly defame any American citizen is unfit IMHO. Last night Lanny Davis said "the President lied when he spoke to the American People." I say when he speaks to us he is on the job. When he is on the job he is under his oath to the constitution. In light of the defamation of an American citizen involved here, hasn't he broken his oath to the constitution here? Isn't calling this defamation for his own purposes a high misdemeanor an understatement? This is exactly what we'd hear from Democrats if Clinton were a Republican- and it's the right way to think about it. It's disgusting and impeachable- even without perjury in court! PERIOD! To forgive this stuff for political reasons just serves to set feminism back about a zillion years. Criminy! You might as well put that Republican dude who had to resign his seat in congress a few years back right back in public service! What was his name? hahaha