Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Machaon who wrote (18074)	12/10/1998 2:54:00 PM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 67261

Jones had witnesses up to Clintons door. Apparently her smoking gun testimony was a "bent crank." Her friends and co-workers whom she'd excitedly told the story to who were aware of it throughout her silence on the matter. NO, I've not been involved in civil litigation. The plaintiff has to foot his/her own bill- and for SURE if false, flimsy, fabricated, unsubstantiated, or simply weak evidence(even when the plaintiff is honestly aggrieved)is likely to cause one to lose the case. I'm glad you are refreshed by my trust. You are however, wrong, in assessing me that way. I recognize the IMPEDIMENTS which motivate folks away from dishonesty particularly where Government isn't involved- a factor which isn't the case in the events you cite! Government run business can make stealing look SO easy! And humans being susceptible as they are to basic greed- well, I think you see where I'm headed from here. Such events as these you mention allow the prepetrators to get the wrong done without ever seeing court nor accusing anyone. It's Apples and Oranges here- thankfully.