SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (18123)12/10/1998 3:01:00 PM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 67261
 
A year ago I would have thought the IC law had no chance of surviving and good riddance. Now, in light of the damage Reno has done to the credibility of the Justice Dept., I'm not so sure.



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (18123)12/10/1998 3:39:00 PM
From: Machaon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<< As to George W, he may be ok, I don't know much about him. >>

I am not an expert on GW Bush, but from what I've read and seen, he has really made a positive impact on Texas. It would be a shame to lose good candidates like him because of the current "witch hunting" atmosphere in Washington.

The GOP really shows lack of judgement when it comes to this impeachment issue. Is the disruption of our government, the disruption of the focus of our country and people, the embarrassment of our nation, the open political wounds being opened, ..., all worth the effort to remove Clinton from office when he only has two years to go, and he has the confidence of the people?

The Republican Soap Opera goes on and on and on on C-Span! I hope that the public really gets angry over this!



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (18123)12/10/1998 4:55:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<I'd bet that whoever's president in 2001, he or she won't have to worry much about...>>

She? How politically correct, yet naive, of you. The sexist Democrats would never nominate a woman.