Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (18131)	12/10/1998 3:26:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Respond to of 67261

Nothing like a little innuendo from Hyde's fellow papal knight. "I hold in my hand the names of . . ."

To: DMaA who wrote (18131)	12/10/1998 3:45:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<< But he said the Justice Department and Office of Independent Counsel had told him making it public now would compromise pending investigations. >> Yeh, right! What a spin! What is more important than having evidence that could be used to impeach the President? But yet, this spinmaster drops accusations, that can't be backed up, on the committee, knowing that the committee will vote for impeachment before he has to show the evidence. What a crock! They have evidence that would help to convict the President and would certainly be powerful info for the impeachment of the President, but they have more important investigations going on. Give me a break. Right now they are talking about She Said, He Said, He gave her gifts, he took back gifts, he was alone with her, she was alone with him, he was alone with her when she was alone with him. The Great Republican Soap Opera!