Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: risk-averse who wrote (33605)	12/10/1998 4:08:00 PM
From: E'Lane	Respond to of 50264

Possibly no one complained or pointed out "personal attacks" from the others. Whoever reported bullmarket probably didn't point out the others. They look at the posts that are brought to their attention, not the whole thread. Just my opinion.

To: risk-averse who wrote (33605)	12/10/1998 4:57:00 PM
From: dch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Have to get specifics from SI about what words or expressions in their eyes represent "personal" posts. If specifics are not provided, then who benefits/learns from the suspension? About moving: As Mr.D and others have advised and even pleaded: if we simply refrain from responding to those who are clearly bent on bashing DGIV and/or being antagonistic toward share holders of DGIV, suspensions would be avoided and a lot of aggravation and turmoil would cease. Certainly discussion can be taken elsewhere, but one would think that it would be just as easy to consistently click past any posts coming from those who fit the basher/shorter profile, so that civility could return. Rather than move to greener (or redder) pastures, how about if we finally discontinue the endless and enervating interaction with the basher faction? It's amazing that, despite the number of times this has been proposed, it's never been carried out. The justification for "fighting back" (preventing the opposition from misrepresenting the facts about DGIV so they don't drive investors away) doesn't hold much weight. We can civilly address false accusations without addressing those who deliver them. Anyone else game for discontinuing gross encounters of the nerd kind? --dch (guilty of engaging nefarious SI entities, and thereby occasionally resembling them)