SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Merck -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Epicenter who wrote (1108)12/10/1998 4:46:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1580
 
Epicenter, Merck's "challenges " have been around for some time, only last year the Street was still quite pessimistic about Merck's future and the stock was stalled for some time. Then suddenly all the big pharmas are hot again, and Merck has done extremely well this year, with all the worries seemingly gone. Nothing has really changed. Merck's cash is better spent by buying or investing in small promising biotechs than by increasing dividends. Another route is by imitating Pfizer: marketing deals with biotechs, U.S. and foreign (e.g. Japan) for promising drugs. Stepped-up R&D is a right step, but they should have done that a few years ago; Pfizer has been ploughing back a bigger percentage of their profits than Merck.



To: Epicenter who wrote (1108)12/10/1998 7:14:00 PM
From: David C. Burns  Respond to of 1580
 
IMHO, I just don't see how MRK can adequately cover the shortfall.
Covering 3.5B is no easy task


The statement was "Merck's revenue from the patent expiring drugs in 2001 may be cut in half from $3.5B to under $2B;"

That's only $1.5-2B to be made up, not $3.5B