Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SIer formerly known as Joe B. who wrote (6238)	12/10/1998 10:43:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Respond to of 12810

Unfortunately, the case only pertains to Zwebner and LGCY. What those clowns have done on AZNT is even more compelling, imo.

To: SIer formerly known as Joe B. who wrote (6238)	12/11/1998 1:13:00 AM
From: X Y Zebra	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12810

Complaint looks like it would survive an initial motion to dismiss, and perhaps advance to trial. It is very well drafted and apppears to be quite serious. Therefore, we can safely conclude, that defendants will suffer acute financial pain.... On the defense alone.... He, he, he, he, he... More like, HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA... I guess a case could be made against the SEC for allowing "non-reporting" companies to issue public stock.... Under the theory of "excessive bureaucratic demented negligence"... Better expressed as "Bureaucratic Efficiency" Such license will never cease to amaze me....