SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Parker Benchley who wrote (12569)12/11/1998 6:59:00 AM
From: Gary1046  Respond to of 19331
 
To all,
I have truly never been associated with a stock that has such great supporters. In the wake of adversity, and this wouldn't be the first time, the way everyone rallies together really makes me proud. The due diligence that is quickly done shows the character of the DCI shareholders. I hold both Joe Murphy and many of the followers of DCI that I have had the privilege to meet and talk with, in the highest esteem. This makes my investment in this fast growing company a "no brainer". People, the shorters are desperate, keep calling in your certificates and as George says, "onward".
Gary



To: Parker Benchley who wrote (12569)12/11/1998 8:40:00 AM
From: James Harold Alton  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19331
 
George, Perhaps you will recall a while back when I stated that as we applied pressure to the shorts via our cert. call that we would have some ugly things brought to this thread about DCI, individuals etc. I think that the thing to keep in mind is that when we see individuals such as this coming on to our thread to slam DCI and raise concerns that this is likely a GOOD SIGN. It means that the cert. call is working and that pressure is being applied to the group behind it. The uglier it gets, the more we know we are getting to em.

AS to the claim that DCI was not healthy?? What the heck was that all about you have to ask yourself. True, the OTC-BB is full of scams and you can fool people for a while, but DCI has been a fully reporting company for years and the revenues have gone up almost every single quarter. My friends and myself have spent countless hours digging and overturning rocks researching DCI and we are still here...and most of us with larger positions to boot. As to raising cash needed for operations, we are expected to be profitable soon, so the outflow which isn't even all that singificant each quarter will soon reverse flow. With our stock price now at a semi-respectable (albeit still way undervalued IMO) level, the company has a host of options to raise cash anytime they need it, though I know they would prefer debt. financing. With a listing we should have a number of new debt placement options. No the statement about DCI not being healthy is total BS IMO and obviously is meant to try and do one thing..to get people to sell. I think that just for the heck of it, I'll pick up a few more shares today. (GG)

James



To: Parker Benchley who wrote (12569)12/11/1998 11:13:00 AM
From: Spider Valdez  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19331
 
i do not post here often but many of you know my position in dctc. i only say this to you after reading this wonderful post here by george. intense diligence is being done on zwebner. investors must perform diligence in these stocks as you all know. the lgcy thread was way to bring some of these issues to light. of course as many of you know zwebner was never "bashed", it was a NO BASH thread! lololol ! regardless this due diligence was very close to home for zwebner imo & this diligence continues. read this silly 'motion', in it he even states he does not go through sheriff to "save costs". lawyers have this silly post and will address it properly. shareholders must not be intimidated by these scare tactics . as you know lgcy faces delisting & many questionable things transpire at the moment that are relevant to dctc shareholders. so i return to lurking but assure all this silly post is being addressed by solid legal minds. it was big mistake imo for zwebner to post such nonsense.
spider



To: Parker Benchley who wrote (12569)12/11/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: Ken Salaets  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19331
 
Here! Here! ggg. eom.

Ken



To: Parker Benchley who wrote (12569)12/11/1998 11:05:00 PM
From: Dorine Essey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19331
 
Dear George ,
A greeting card for all our Jewish friends

Dorinehttp://www.bluemountain.com/cards/box3793c/kic5exkswcgfee.htm