Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JustInTime who wrote (2909)	12/11/1998 7:36:00 AM
From: thebeach	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

Thanks , and that is exactly what that reply was worth. Your world must be very small and you should do more homework.IFMX is on the road back and if you think otherwise check the stock price and volume.

To: JustInTime who wrote (2909)	12/11/1998 1:15:00 PM
From: Fredman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

With the Y2K issues at hand, CIO's want a PROVEN product, because development doesn't happen overnight. They want a product they can get in the door, and have developed and working in the least amount of time, and not have to dick with a product for X months and then finding out it doesn't want to do what they want, OR find out nobody is available to help develop it (consultants), and in-house training takes too long. or it doesn't work. I can't tell you how many products, both hardware AND software i've had to junk because the Rep LIED to me/us, or the books that come with it say it can do X thing, but it doesn't...... All kinds of ideas come to mind, but anymore, Oracle is the way people are going, and also SQL, and also ACCESS on a smaller scale. And that is simply the way it is. People are out of time to dicker.