Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CheckFree Holdings Corp. (CKFR), the next Dell, Intel? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AugustWest who wrote (610)	12/11/1998 12:19:00 PM
From: Benny Baga	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20297

In reality, I don't think Integrion is dead just yet. In fact there is an advertisement in the January issue of BS+T for Integrion. Like anything that the banks do, they don't die a quick death, they just slowly fade away. Benny(IMHO)

To: AugustWest who wrote (610)	12/11/1998 1:09:00 PM
From: g_m10	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20297

I think it would make perfect sense for CF to initiate divorce with Integrion before we read obituary on Integrion in papers and for several reasons. 1. How many analysts know that Integrion is just a dummy, that CF achieved everything on its own? When news that Integrion dissolving hits the street, it will be perceived as a bad news for CF. 2. Dumping Integrion before it goes into oblivion will neutralize any negative impact, and it would look quite bold. You'd better look bold than shy. We suffered enough from CF's shyness. 3. If CF explains that it doesn't want to lose big time on warrants, it will sound as a confidence in future. We don't know how the contract was written. CF may not have an option of leaving Integrion, but in any case they should take preventive steps. Before Integrion disappears, it should become a common knowledge that it's never been more than a dummy. Just MHO.